Tuesday, 9 February 2016



Conflict Resolution Nō 53 and other stuff.

Getting lost and finding out along the way.

 There is something magical when immersed in the act of painting, that of being in the moment, the absolute joy in discovering a shape, mark or colour that begins to transform the blank canvas; an unexplainable symbiosis that is very much an interior sensation,  witnessing the flow of wet paint, never completely sure about the final outcome. I have no issue in watching paint dry!

 Of course, the next phase presents a whole new ball game. How to maintain the immediacy without overworking, without overthinking and ultimately, without fear of getting lost. Accepting the unexpected is for me, part of the process in developing the work. This means it is in a continuous state of flux and this means continuous reassessment of the work and also, of me. Just exactly why am I making these images? What is the point? How valid is process led work?

 And .... why do I keep insisting on asking questions? My head hurts!

 The work continues:

 As usual all canvasses are started laid out on the studio floor, where creases dictate the initial point of contact. Colour choice random. Once the first mark is made, the conversation begins. There usually follows a pattern of doing so much, leaving the studio and on return responding immediately to the inner voice. At this stage there is no right way up, the painting is worked from all directions, I still like the idea of the image dictating how it is eventually viewed.










This approach may lead to a painting that requires minimal intervention or layer upon layer before the conversation stops. As the images evolve there is also a connection with its subject matter. Events that seep into the psyche rise to the surface as the painting reveals itself. World news that is very much about the rewriting of history, removal of monuments that have stood for thousands of years, that were symbols of past civilisations. These acts of excessive editing have resonated loudly with me. What drives us to deny the past? It strikes me that once you engage in these acts of destruction, you lose the argument. In order to maintain control you introduce fear and in this, you are no better than those that you rally against. 


Last Monument Standing



Embroidering a new landscape




Conflict Resolution Nō 53




Cruciform



Consumerist Ideology


The Fall of Palmyra




Polaris - Big Cock in a boat


The etchings continue to explore the theme of constant editing and the reality of the past remaining in the present.









Latest state of play

105 cm x 105 cm

1 comment:

  1. Find the etching more poignant and the paintings, the forlorn shapes in ambiguous spaces. By its very nature, etching is a very difficult process to painting. I wonder whether that timeframe differences, between these two processes is dictating the dialogue with the work? In that the act of reacting to a line, colour or mark is that much quicker in painting.
    Does the process of reacting to the creases in the canvas always be the starting point? Could connections be made between the etchings and canvases? Possibly photographing and project the lines from the etching onto a canvas and therefore making connect between these two bodies of works?

    ReplyDelete